RUSH LIMBAUGH
         WWDB RADIO - 11/5/96 - 12:00 P.M.
         Rush L. - Thank you, thank you, ready to go here, Rush Limbaugh 
         high atop the EIB Building in mid-town Manhattan behind the golden 
         EIB microphones.  My friends we are speaking to you on the most 
         listened radio talk show in American history - 650 radio stations, 
         20 million people tuning in during the week - that's that we know. 
         There are probably about another 30 or 40 biased audience members 
         that we just like the Labor Department when they calculate jobs, 
         half the jobs they report created every month are biased factor 
         jobs - they can't prove them but they just know they're there. 
         Well, we have about 30 listeners we can't put our - million 
         listeners we can't put our hands on, we know they're there, so the 
         grand total 50 million per week here on the excellence in 
         broadcasting network. You know it amazes - it's no wonder to me 
         that the country sometimes goes through these convulsions.  When I 
         get mail like I got yesterday berating me for being negative -
         they're not listening and even when they hear it - they don't hear 
         it.  It's like we got a call from a guy the other week - last week 
         - who was upset with me for not saying something.  I should be 
         saying this more and I - but I had just - and the guy is - You're 
         not saying it the way it should be said, the way you talk about 
         these people is you call 'em Socialist, you call 'em Marxist and I 
         don't hear you do it.  Just the previous hour you know I had told 
         a story about running into some people at a restaurant who just 
         crept up to me and well anyway....  My friends this is election day 
         and federal regulations require that there be no electioneering on 
         election day.  Now what that means to those of us in the powerful, 
         influential world of the media is that we are not supposed to be 
         partisan today.  What it means to campaigners is they can't do 
         speeches on the grounds of the polling place.  They can't put signs 
         up or any of that.  However partisanship does go on today.  I mean 
         the Democrats and Republicans and the Libertarians, everybody is 
         doing everything they can to drive voters to the polls.  There is 
         all sorts of efforts being made - candidates are being talked to. 
         





         I heard an interview with Pert not long ago as he drove he and his 
         daughter - himself and his daughter to the polling place.  So, how 
         might ask will I, Rush Limbaugh, American truth detector, get 
         around federal regulations that says no partisanship.  It's very 
         easy.  I'm going to take my lesson from Bill Clinton and just say 
         that whatever I do today is not partisan.  That it is done in the 
         interest of togetherness, holding hands and building that bridge to 
         the 21st century.  Everything that you hear on this program today 
         my friends is oriented towards all of us working together for the 
         future.  Having said that let me launch into some more sneaky 
         campaign contributions that were made to the - now this is not 
         partisan because I say it isn't and if anybody wants to call here 
         and accuse me of being partisan - you are in for it.  I'm going to 
         come after you with both barrels.  I'm going to find out everything 
         in your background and I'm gonna to do a Clinton on you.  I am 
         gonna investigate you.  I'm gonna find out everything in the world 
         I can about you.  I'm gonna question your motives; I'm gonna 
         question your integrity, I'm gonna question your patriotism; I'm 
         gonna question everything about you if you don't believe what I 
         say.  And I'm telling you that what happens on this award-winning, 
         thrill-packed, every exciting, increasingly popular, growing by 
         leaps and bounds program today is not partisan, because I respect 
         federal regulations.  Now let's talk about some of this dirty money 
         that ended up in the White House.  This is a story actually from 
         yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, an Iraq Ameri - in case you didn't 
         hear it I just want to lead into the latest Riate story with this 
         one.  And by the way, by the way, by the  - guess what, I was 
         reading in the paper today, I was reading in the paper USA Today -
         Clinton's going on a Hawaii vacation after - two week vacation -
         two week total - he's going to spend something like ten days in 
         Asia.  He has a whole hotel booked in Bangkok.  He does my friends. 
         Part of the Pacific rim economic - he does, he does, this is not 
         partisan.  I am simply reporting news to you.  I'll bet you Wong 
         does have a room - Wong probably has a whole bunch of rooms, 
         probably a Wong there and a Wong there and a whole bunch of Wongs
         





         over the President.  You didn't hear me Mr. Snerderly - the 
         President is going to Bang - he's got an Asian - ten day Asian 
         tour.  I mean he's leaving - whenever he leaves after the vacation 
         after he and Hilary have gone out there and thanked America for 
         acquitting them of all charges, he's then going to head to Asia. 
         He's going to Bangkok.  Who knows - do you understand the 
         significance of this?  No, he not going to thank the voters there, 
         he going to thank the contributors there.  There aren't any voters 
         there.  There are contributors.  He is going to Asia for ten days -
         that's what it says in USA Today.  Do you think this is 
         coincidence?  Now you know the interesting thing about Bangkok, 
         especially as it relates to Clinton and I warn you again my friends 
         this is not partisan today.  Bangkok, Thailand, is the city with 
         the largest number of prostitutes per capita in the world.  What an 
         interesting statistic given the name of the city, Bangkok, largest 
         percentage of prostitutes per capita any city in the world.  And 
         Bill Clinton's got a while hotel booked there - not just a couple 
         of floors.  He's got the whole hotel booked.  I have inside 
         sources. This is not partisan ladies and gentlemen, we're simply 
         reporting to you the news.  Now an Iraq American family which 
         wanted sanctions against Iraq eased, gave about $400,000 at a fund 
         raiser attended by President Clinton.  The Detroit Free Press 
         reported this yesterday as controversy over foreign political 
         contributions escalated on the final day of the campaign.  The 
         President in meetings with people attending the private fund raiser 
         promised to work toward lifting the embargo.  The President 
         promised to work toward lifting the embargo against Iraq and 
         sending food and medicine to the Iraq people.  Nothing illegal 
         about a contribution I guess - $400,000, Iraq American families, 
         soft money, went to the party, everything is hunky dory still.  Now 
         the news today of course, Washington Post has this one all over the 
         place.  James Riate, the son of Motzar Riate, these are the guys 
         from Lipro-suction.  James Riate made frequent visits to the White 
         House.  During about six trips to Washington discussed U.S. Asian 
         trade relations with the President and urged presidential aides to
         





         put Asian Americans in government posts.  Clinton aides previously 
         had disclosed only  that James Riate had three largely social chats 
         with the president at the white house .  Riate wanted to see a 
         reaching out, trying to involve more Asian Americans in the work of 
         the administration said Mike McCurry.  They admitted all of this 
         yesterday.  They figured the day before election how can we be 
         hurt.  I've got a couple of other things.  Do I have time to get 
         them in before the break?  Well I'm going to set both these up and 
         then we'll take the break.  Because there are a lot of other things 
         - have you seen - I haven't been paying attention to any of this 
         latest O.J. Simpson stuff but I saw a picture of O.J. Simpson in 
         the New York Post today.  Have you seen how much weigh he has 
         gained?  And he is accused now of sexually harassing some secretary 
         in the court house, which leads me into this subject.  There are 
         things that you read that spark thoughts and I had that happen to 
         me last night.  And I wished that it had happened earlier. There's 
         been something troubling me all along about this Soccer Mom 
         phenomenon and it's not that the Soccer Mom phenomenon exists 
         because let's assume for the sake of this discussion that what we 
         know about it is  actually true.  But it seems to be so strange to 
         me that the phenomenon did exist, given the desires and directions 
         and I guess the gains that have been made by feminists in this 
         country.  Because the conflict is this, we have been conditioned 
         low these past 25 years - now 26 or 27 - I actually target the 
         beginning of the modern feminist era the late 60's - 68 - 69, 
         because that's when I first got hit over the head by it.  The young 
         16 year old dee jay doing a remote              .    One of my high 
         school broadcast partners, a woman, started talking about feminist 
         things and I didn't know what it was at the time but later as I 
         reflected I understood that this was the beginning of the modern -
         she was 16 and she was articulating all of these things, the equal 
         rights amendment and all this other stuff.  And if you look at the 
         direction the feminists have said we should go, what is the one the 
         one underlying concept that they have put forth.  It is that there 
         are no differences between men and women other than physiological
         





         and even then those differences are small.  They are so small that 
         women can go to combat; that women can engage in the same type 
         physical activities as men do and you don't have to lower the 
         standards in these physical requirements in order to qualify women 
         for whatever it is military, forrest ranger, fireman -  whatever it 
         is.  We clearly know that that isn't true but that has been one of 
         the things that they have attempted to move forward - that there is 
         no difference between men and women.  And yet, look at the Soccer 
         Mom phenomenon.  The Soccer Mom phenomenon requires that we look at 
         women differently.  And how?   It requires that we look at women 
         and approach women and attempt to persuade women with emotions and 
         with tears and with feelings and you might say that both parties 
         tried it.  Look at both conventions - it was a sob story, after a 
         sob story, after a sob story.  And whoever got the most tears was 
         said to have had the most successful convention, the most 
         successful presentation; the most meaningful and compassionate, in-
         touch convention.  And this goes totally against the grain  of what 
         modern feminists, the militant one especially have told us - that 
         there are no differences.  Well you certainly don't go after men by 
         appealing to their tears.  You don't go after men by appealing to 
         their emotions.  You certainly do not want men crying as a means of 
         proclaiming I reached that guy, look at those tears, but women you 
         do.  I have been dead right about the arousal gap.  The thing that 
         I have left out of the equation, ladies and gentlemen, is that this 
         is a huge slap in the face of feminists.  feminists decry all this 
         emotional content that women are supposed to have.  I'll tell you 
         what led me - there were two things that led me into this - there 
         was a column by Mr. Buckley yesterday.  It ran in the New York Post 
         and he asked the question - are men and women really different when 
         it comes to politics.  Do we really have to approach men and women 
         in different ways and if so, what does that say about our future 
         and then I was moseying on the Internet last night and I ran across 
         yesterday's Washington Times and there was a column by Richard 
         Griener who I happened to meet a long, long time ago.  I went down 
         to the Heritage Foundation when I was new. and nobody knew who I
         





         was  and they invited me down there.  Who is this Limbaugh guy.  So 
         Bill Bennett called and said why don't you come down and introduce 
         yourself to these people; we'll have a little dinner at 5 or 6 
         o'clock and we'll have a round table discussion and Griener was one 
         of the guys there.  Ed Fulmer, Kate Oburn - that's where I met all 
         these people for the first time and I'll never forget Griener 
         because he was a unique individual.  Anyway I read this piece and 
         he touches on this in his own way, not so much in the Soccer Mom 
         mode but in a general attack on feminism and how it says one thing 
         and then gives us another.  And then - we'll get into this in more 
         detail - then John Leo's column on society in this week's U.S. News 
         and World Report, has to do with what's going on out in California, 
         Prop 209.  And the basic point he makes is that if the anti 209ers 
         get their way, that a number of Blacks, a number of Latinos and a 
         number of women are going to have to be fired because they already 
         have a greater percentage  of the jobs than is represented by their 
         population percentage of the state at large.  He says they're 
         cutting their own throats.  It's a fascinating piece.  Anyway 
         there's that, we have a whole bunch of stuff too, as well as your 
         phone calls, on the totally non-partisan  excellence in 
         broadcasting network, election day special on the Rush Limbaugh 
         Program.  
         Commercial
         Rush L. - All right, there you have it, Rush Limbaugh, the epitome 
         of fairness and even handedness on election day 1996, totally non-
         partisan presentation.  Mr. Snerdsley informs me that the long 
         knives are out today.  He just told me during the commercial break 
         that he's got the name callers calling in droves - that this hasn't 
         happened in a while, that what's happening is that he answers the 
         phone and that people start calling me names, cursing me and start 
         shouting, loose their composure and hang up.  And as they're on the 
         way to hanging up, Mr. Snerdsley says have a nice day.  He says 
         this hasn't happened in a long time.  Mr. Snerdsley asked me - what 
         have you done that's irritated these people so much because he has 
         not been listening to every second of the show - he's been
         





         screening calls.  I said I don't know, it must be the fact that 
         they've been Clintoned, because I said that I'm going to do a 
         totally non-partisan program today and that no matter what you hear 
         on this program, you can't accuse me of being partisan because I 
         say it's non-partisan.  Other than that what has them more upset 
         than usual.  I can't think of it.  We also had a guy who hung up on 
         us.  He was going to be our first call.  A guy named Edgar from 
         Boston and Edgar was right out of the seminar, right out of the 
         Democratic National Committee Seminar.  He can't believe I'm so 
         mean-spirited to President Clinton and he wanted to talk to me 
         about it.  What else was it Mr. Snerdsley - I am so mean-spirited, 
         and yes, that's the part that we know it's a seminar caller - he is 
         going to accuse me of contributing to the lack of civility.  Edgar, 
         I knew the moment I saw your name go up on my high tech monitor 
         that you were a plant; that you were a fraud.  I've met both 
         Republicans in Boston and not one of them name is named Edgar. 
         Edgar identified himself as a Republican, that's what the plants 
         always do.  So we have a cellular call from Bird Island, Minnesota. 
         We'll start with Ed.  Ed welcome to the program, nice to hear you. 
         
         Ed - Good afternoon Rush.  First time caller, I have tried to call 
         many, many times.  I'm really, really enthused.  I think Bob Dole 
         is going to come out a lot better than anybody thinks today.  
         Rush L - Well let's do our own exit polling.  You know I think it's 
         one of the things that we can do here that - of course this is 
         going on at every polling place - well select key precincts and 
         we've just dubbed this programs a select key precinct.  And so this 
         is not part of electioneering and this is certainly non-partisan 
         ladies and gentlemen, because all we're asking for is information. 
         And so Ed, let me ask you as our first participant in our own exit 
         poll - who did you vote for. 
         
         Ed - Rush, I have not voted yet.  I'm on my way to the VA hospital 
         in St. Cloud. 
         Rush L - Well make it up a little bit here Ed, pretend that you
         





         have voted and it's afterwards and who did you vote for Ed. 
         Ed -  I voted for Bob Dole.  
         Rush L - There you go.  There's our first exit poll result on non-
         partisan election day on the excellence in broadcasting network on 
         the Rush Limbaugh program.  Now it says you want to say something 
         here about Ross Perot - can you say that quickly. 
         
         Ed - I voted for Perot 4 years ago and I shouldn't have.  I really 
         do like Ross Perot.  Rush, me and you would agree on a lot of 
         things and we disagree on a lot of things. 
         
         Rush L - Well, but you're home now and we welcome you home on non-
         partisan election day EIB Rush Limbaugh special. 
         
         Commercial
         
         Rush L - Welcome back ladies and gentlemen, Rush Limbaugh executing 
         flawlessly assigned host duties.  And by the way you know my mail 
         shows it too.  There is a new crap of mail from people, you know I 
         used to listen to you a lot but your arrogance is rubbing me the 
         wrong way.  Well my friends first off it is not arrogance and it 
         isn't bragging if you can do it and I can do it.  It's just the way 
         it is.  It's just confidence - you people - you know what that is -
         that's proof the audience continues to grow.  Because that's 
         symptomatic of first time, second time, third time listeners.  It's 
         the non-partisan election day special here on the excellence in 
         broadcasting network.  What's happening on Wall Street.  Here's the 
         latest - the Dow Jones Industrial average gained - get this now 
         more than 50 points Tuesday aided by a strong bond market and aided 
         by Wall Street's growing conviction that the Democrats will not 
         take back control of Congress.  The stock market going through the 
         roof today on the basis that the people there analyzing the 
         election think the Democrats will not regain control of Congress, 
         therefore it's up 50 points.  That's the latest news on today's 
         non-partisan special on election day; the Rush Limbaugh program. 
         





         Greg in Westerville, Ohio - have you voted. 
         
         Greg - Yes I have Rush.  Many, many buck eye dittos from 
         Westerville, Ohio; home of John Casey, buddy. 
         Rush L -  Thank you for the call - who did you vote for?  
         Greg -  Bob Dole
         Rush L - Well, there's two in our exit poll.
         Greg - Voted 6 hours and 4 minutes ago
         Rush L -  Congratulations sir. 
         Greg -  And the polling place I go to - both my wife and I went -
         and I've voted 3 times since I moved up here.
         Rush L -  On the same day?
         Greg - No, no, no, no, no, but I've voted 3 times since I moved up 
         here and the place was packed.  We started pulling and all these 
         cars started pulling into the parking lot - it's dark at 6:30, it's 
         raining lightly and one guy made it in there and we all made a 
         beeline for it and it was packed - 
         Rush L -  Heavy turnout in Westerville, Ohio it sounds like. 
         Greg - Yes, it was and we were walking back after we were done and 
         I did an informal poll and everybody but one voted for Bob Dole and 
         the other one was for Ross Perot.
         Rush L - How many would you say in this informal poll - we can add 
         it to our own exit poll here on our non-partisan election day 
         special. 
         Greg -  I think I talked to about 8 people. 
         Rush L -  Eight people so that gives us 10 Dole votes and one 
         Perot. 
         Greg - Look, I got to say I miss you on TV. I really do.  
         Rush L - I get this a lot. 
         Greg - I remember when you were on here at WSYX here in Columbus 
         and after you had made your announcement - oh, they had fun with 
         you.  They put you everywhere.  We had to stay up all night just to 
         watch you and I never saw your last show. 
         Rush L -  Well that was the way it was anyway.  That was the whole 
         -
         





         Greg - I would like to get a copy of the last show if it's possible 
         because I have a copy of your first show and I really would, if 
         there is any way I'd like to. 
         
         Rush L - There is but it costs money. 
         Greg - Okay
         Rush L - Not to me, not to me, No, no, no, not to me, no, no, I 
         don't get anything from it.  What's the phone number - what's the 
         Burrell's phone number.  Yeah, here you go, call 800-FOR VIDEO and 
         tell them you want the last - I don't know the date, what was the 
         date - well that was our last tape date, but the air date - Well 
         try August 5th or 6th somewhere around there.
         Greg - August 5th or 6th.  Okay. 
         Rush L. - August 5th or 6th, the Friday of that week, whatever it 
         is. 
         Greg -  I've got a couple of other things to be non-partisan here. 
         
         Rush L - Yeah, go ahead. 
         
         Greg -  Man, I can't believe I'm talking to you.  It's been five 
         years since I have been trying to get in here. 
         Rush - Well there's a non-partisan comment - see what I mean ladies 
         and gentlemen about this being our non-partisan special on election 
         day. 
         Greg - Well you were talking about women before.  My wife is 
         probably more conservative than I am and there is a lot of women I 
         know like that.  I'll tell you what - my wife calls Clinton a liar 
         just all the time.  She can't stand to see him.  And as far as 
         Hilary, she actually wants a pay for view match on TV in a cage 
         with her.  
         Rush L - Really?
         Greg -  She does. 
         Rush - Your wife?
         Greg - Yes.  She said she would go down in 19 seconds or less.  
         Rush L - Well now this is getting a little bit beyond the scope of
         





         our non-partisan..... To suggest a caged match between your wife 
         and Hilary is - I think, federal regulations would frown here on 
         the programming content today.  But thank you anyway for this 
         passion that you brought to the program.  August 9th, there's the 
         date, August 9th, is the last date of the Rush Television Show -
         I've just been informed.  Greg, thanks for the call.  Glen Arbor 
         Township, Michigan.  This is Eric - you're on the EIB network. 
         Eric - Hi Rush, how are you doing.  I voted for Bob Dole. 
         Rush L -  That's eleven. 
         Eric - And we have 700 registered voters here in Glen Arbor 
         Township.  This is a Republican stronghold so I think Bob Dole will 
         do overwhelmingly well....
         Rush L - There you have it my friends - Dole carries Glen Arbor 
         Township re: Limbaugh program projection based on exit polling 
         data. 
         Eric -  Anyway, Rush, the reason why I'm calling and it should be 
         up there on your screen is it seems like at least from a popular 
         vote viewpoint, the electorial viewpoint I can't begin to project 
         but I was concerned about this election from the beginning because 
         in talking to women voters, it was very hard to find women that 
         wanted to vote for Bob Dole.  My calculations - I come up prior to 
         the pro-factor being in there is that Clinton would get 53 percent 
         of the popular vote and that's based upon the assumption that 
         somewhere between 65 and 67 percent of women in this country, which 
         will probably make up about 52 percent of the people that go to the 
         polls would vote for Clinton and assuming that 60 percent of the 
         males in this country would vote for Bob Dole, which gives 40 
         percent of the women voting for Clinton.
         Rush L -  Yeah, I follow you. 
         Eric - Okay - 53 percent prior to pro-factor and I think that was 
         a good strategic move by Bob Dole to try to get Perot to come with 
         the support because then the numbers would have narrowed 
         significantly.  I was also interested yesterday when you had Bob 
         Dole and George Bush and his son on the program.  If I remember 
         four years ago when George Bush was running against President
         





         Clinton you had him on the show too.  If Bob Dole doesn't win this 
         time, in the year 2000, let's not jinx the Republican candidate by 
         bringing him on the show the last day of the election because I was 
         really surprised.  I mean it was an honor to hear him on the show 
         but I was surprised and I said oh, oh shades of four years ago. 
         Rush L -  On come on Eric, you don't believe in this superstition 
         stuff do you?  I mean if you believe in superstition stuff then 
         you've got to say Dole is gonna win because the Yankees won the 
         World Series.  Come on, stop and think about this because Dole 
         appears on my show yesterday he looses.  And you want a copy of my 
         last TV show.  I mean this is .....  All we did here was answer the 
         phone yesterday.  That's number one.  Number two, I was honored to 
         hear from the presidential candidate and the former president and 
         the current governor of Texas.  So I reject, even though I know 
         you're trying to be helpful - I reject on this non-partisan special
         edition of the Rush Limbaugh program that theory that of course is 
         founded in nothing but mysticism.   Quick break here.  More on this 
         women thing - the Soccer Mom phenomenon and what's feminism role in 
         all this has been.  Don't go away. 
         Commercial
         Rush L -  We are back, Rush Limbaugh  serving humanity on this the 
         excellence in broadcasting network.  We are going to add another 
         vote to our exit poll - Rabbi Segal just showed up and allowed us -
         he is the official Rabbi of the EIB Network.  Now my friends I want 
         to go back and expand on this whole feminism Soccer Mom thing 
         because this really is fascinating and it has I think a tremendous 
         amount of interest at least for me for the future.  And I set this 
         up again.  I have been troubled by this whole Soccer Mom phenomenon 
         for the longest time and I was able to put my finger on it.  And it 
         had its roots - the reason I was trouble it had its roots -
         troubles had it roots in feminism.  Something seemed to be totally 
         at odds with the desires of feminists in this whole thing and let 
         me in brief explain it again.  Feminists - the militant ones - an 
         I am talking - I know a lot of you women think of yourselves as 
         feminists and I'm not talking about you when I talk about the Bella
         





         Abzuggs and the Gloria Steinams and the Patricia Irelands and 
         basically the real extreme, so far out of the mainstream feminists. 
         I mean these are the women that have this anti-male view.  Their 
         feminism is based on an anti-male attitude.  And these people have 
         been promoting for the longest time, the fact that there's no 
         difference between men and women except a few small physiological 
         differences.  Right - now that's fundamental to understanding what 
         they're all about - that women can be firemen.  And you don't have 
         to lower the standards for men in order to qualify women.  They say 
         women can fly fighter jets. 
                                   (GAP)
         And yet if you look at the Soccer Mom phenomenon, you find that the 
         way to get to these women is precisely through the emotions; 
         through their tears - compassion, gut-wrenching, emotional parlays 
         that evoke tears is how you get to these women.  You have to make 
         them think that you are their provider; that you care about them. 
         This is the antithesis of feminism.  What brought all of this home 
         to me was my perusing the Washington Times yesterday and a column 
         by Richard Griener.  And the title of his piece is - Will America 
         Survive Feminism.  And I want to read to you just a couple of 
         paragraphs from his piece.  How did this strange inversion of 
         traditional social patterns come about.  Radical feminist doctrine 
         which against all common sense now prevails among politically 
         correct Americans.  Holds that women are identical to men except 
         for certain physiological details and that their record of 
         achievement should also be identical.  There should be as many 
         women CEOs of Fortune 500 companies as men, as many women fighter 
         pilots.  But this year's pandering to women by both political 
         parties is actually in complete contradiction to feminist doctrine 
         as it is based on the principle that women are very different 
         indeed.  And Buckley's column yesterday too, raise the same 
         question.  What is this, men and women are different.  I thought 
         that they weren't.  You have to approach men and women differently 
         now.  As opposed to men it seems women just adore emotion; they 
         just adore compassion; they adore vulnerability; they adore
         





         weakness.  Candidates who have suffered pain and cried real tears. 
         Only such candidates are capable of appreciating the world's 
         misery.  No prizes are being handed out this year for strength; no 
         prizes are being handed out this year for self restraint; no prizes 
         are being handed out this year for discipline.  The nominating 
         conventions of both parties and a large part of the campaigns which 
         followed have thus been agonizing extensive soap operas of the 
         tear-jerker variety.  Emotion has been prized over reason; the 
         personal over the public.  With little sense of the common good 
         women it now appears engage in politics for a good cry.  Well 
         personally I have never doubted that women were different from men 
         but European women are different from men also and we're left with 
         this perditious feminist volt-face that separated America from 
         Europe.  And the key might not be American women  but the extent to 
         which in recent decades American men have suddenly allowed 
         themselves to be intimidated by a really quite tiny number of 
         radical feminists, which I totally echo - I totally echo it.  And 
         it happened in Washington, D.C.  It started there and it is spread 
         out across the fruited plain.  But you can see the fallacious 
         faults in this by simply looking at recent sexual harassment suits 
         or cases.  Compare Anima Hill and Clarence Thomas to Paula Jones 
         and Bill Clinton and you will find no consistency on the part of 
         the feminists.  And in fact, you'll find the feminists going after 
         Paula Jones.  They will go after her viciously but they would not 
         go after Anima Hill, and Paula Jones has real evidence - real and 
         corroborative evidence.  Anima Hill had none.  Anima Hill didn't 
         even fit the profile of the sexually harassed woman.  The sexually 
         harassed women generally tells somebody within 10 or 90 minutes, a 
         couple of days at least.  Anima Hill waited years to tell anybody 
         and then it had to be dragged out of her.  Well the excuse for that 
         was she was so emotional and distraught that she didn't want to.  
         And in those 10 years she kept following Clarence Thomas everywhere 
         he went trying to benefit from his climbing of his own ladder. 
         Paula Jones did everything she could to stay away from Bill Clinton
         after this had happened and yet the feminists of America go after
         





         Paula Jones.  Some say the reason they went after Paula Jones is 
         because she is a trailer park, Arkansas hick.  And that really 
         feminism is really nothing more than a culturally elite band of 
         extreme women who are uppity and snobbish.  And I think there is n 
         element of that but I think that's not the sole reason; the sole 
         reason is that they are flat out Socialist/Liberals and that 
         they're going to protect their own.  How else do you explain these 
         radical feminists who are eager to destroy Bob Packwood, eager to 
         destroy Clarence Thomas; give Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton and 
         other well known respecters of women a pass and not only a pass but 
         actually a nice push.  It has to be ideology but you have to wonder 
         what kind of success the feminists are ultimately having if in 
         order to get the female vote in this country you have to be the 
         antitheses of what the feminists have said you must do in treating 
         women.  You have to make em cry; you have to make em dependent; you 
         have to appeal to the emotions - you have to go after women in a 
         totally different way than you approach male voters.  Why is this? 
         Is it because there are indeed differences between men and women 
         and that the militant feminists have long sought to gloss over and 
         erase but have failed to do.  I think ultimately yes, the only 
         women - the only people who are cowed by militant feminists these 
         days are a bunch of liberal limp-wrists in the nation's capital, to 
         whom the idea of a real man is Michael Kinsley.  Take a break here 
         folks, on our non-partisan election day special here on the Rush 
         Limbaugh program.  Back after this. 
         Commercial
         Rush L - Welcome back ladies and gentlemen, Rush Limbaugh enjoying 
         myself and having more fun than a human being should be allowed to 
         have.  It is our election day special presentation, a non-partisan 
         Rush Limbaugh program today as federal regulations require. 
         Christine, in Fairmount, West Virginia, welcome to the program. 
         Christine - Hi, Rush.  How're you doing.
         Rush L - Just fine.  Have you voted? 
         Christine - I sure have.
         Rush L - I want you to participate here in our exit poll.  How did
         





         you vote?
         Christine - All righty.  I voted for Dole and Kemp. 
         Rush L -  Well there you have it.  There you have it and on the 
         basis of this early projection ladies and gentlemen, we are able to 
         say that Bob Dole will carry the state of West Virginia based on 
         early exit polling data.  Dole carries West Virginia and grabs all 
         electorial votes in that state and we called this state at 12:56 
         Eastern Time on our non-partisan special election show. 
         Christine - Well Rush everybody says that Bill Clinton has already 
         gotten the projection of winning. 
         Rush L - Who says that?
         Christine - Well the news media has been saying that for gosh, 
         three weeks now. Nobody should vote because  Bill Clinton is 
         winning.  Bill Clinton is winning - why waste your vote.  
         Rush L -  Why we haven't been saying nobody should vote and you may 
         be assuming that's their implication.  Anybody watch Monday night 
         football last night.  By the way, how about those Denver Broncos. 
         Congratulations to John L. Way, Pat Baldwin, Mike Shannohan  of the 
         Denver Broncos - 8 and 1.  Best record in the AFC and they came 
         back anyway half time.  Instead of interviewing a football figure 
         Al Michaels interview Peter Jennings, and Peter Jennings called the 
         race last night.  Peter Jennings said - well Al we expect that our 
         pre-election polling to pretty much hold up tomorrow, but in an 
         effort now to keep viewers tonight he said we really expect to be 
         kept up late with some house races that are too close to call now 
         as the Democrats go for a clean sweep.  So last night ABC projected 
         Bill Clinton the winner.  They got Dole up by 16 points and the 
         plus or minus margin of errors is like two points.  So half-time, 
         last night.  Half time.  But based on our exit polling data that we 
         have amassed today, ladies and gentlemen, we project Bob Dole wins 
         West Virginia. 
         Christine -  All right, I like that. 
         Rush L -  There you go. All right, thanks Christine, very much for 
         the phone call.  No enough time to be fair with another call here 
         friends.  We do have two hours left of today's broadcast and yet to
         





         come a discussion of the mess the anti 209ers in California will 
         give themselves should they prevail.  However, however late polling 
         data coupled with exit polling data amassed on this program 
         indicates that the support for Prop 209 is widening as of last 
         night, going into election day.  Back with more non-partisan 
         programming in a brief moment or two. 
         Commercials and News
         Rush L - Welcome back or greetings period, whichever is the case if 
         you have been with us, glad to stayed or if you're just joining us 
         welcome.  It's the Rush Limbaugh program, this is the excellence in 
         broadcasting network - a special - the election presentation. 
         Federal regulations require that all partisanship cease on 
         commercial broadcast properties during election day.  In accordance 
         with federal elections, this is a special non-partisan edition of 
         the Rush Limbaugh program on this the excellence in broadcasting 
         network. 
         Commercial 
         Rush L - Thank you Johnny Donovan.  Thanks one and all.  To 
         illustrate just how far I'm willing to go here ladies and gentlemen 
         in making this a non-partisan broadcast today, we are featuring 
         various campaign speeches made by all candidates, well candidates 
         representing all political parties and persuasions and yet, here we 
         go playing for you another example of a campaign speech of someone 
         you might not think is aligned with me. -  "Is this Clinton 
         Country, and although we all do what needs to be done for the next 
         2-12 weeks, and we elect Mark Roosevelt as our Governor and you re-
         elect old Kennedy in the United States, we're going to re-elect
           (campaign speech) 
         Rush L - Welcome my friends to the non-partisan special edition of 
         the Rush Limbaugh program today, where we are conducting our own 
         exit poll.  Each caller who gets on the air is being asked to tell 
         for which candidate he or she voted.  So far our exit polling data 
         has enabled us to project the entire state of West Virginia for Bob 
         Dole and well as East - something or other - Township in Michigan. 
         Where was that Mr. Snerderly.  Glen Arbor Township, Michigan, has
         





         done for Bob Dole, according to early exit poll projections made 
         last hour on this special non-partisan edition of the Rush Limbaugh 
         program.  Other items in the news before we return to your phone 
         calls and by if you would like to join us the number is 800-282-
         2882.  This would come under the contradicting information category 
         -  I have the Nov. 11th issue U.S. News and World Report and that 
         would be the most recent issue and there is a conversation with 
         Housing and Urban Development Secretary (soon to be leaving this 
         post) Henry Cisneros.  And in his conversations with the reporters 
         and reporterettes at U.S. News, he addressed many subjects and one 
         of the subjects that the Secretary of Housing addressed was how to 
         fill the housing gap.  There is a housing gap in America and don't 
         forget now that Ruth Bader Ginsburg says our constitution is 
         outdated.  It does not compare well to constitutions that have been 
         written to structure recent great democracies since the 1800s and 
         I don't know which democracies these are but she says we need to 
         write the housing and write the food spelled out in our 
         constitution.  She will probably be the next Chief Justice of the 
         Supreme Court and/or she stands a chance of being.  The only way it 
         can happen I guess is if our early exit polling data is way off the 
         mark.  Because right now we have Dole in a land slide in our early 
         exit poll data upon this our special non-partisan edition.  Anyway 
         Cisneros said this - the single most important thing I would do to 
         fill the housing gap would be to ask for the requisite level of 
         Section Eight funding.  We want more taxes, that's just another way 
         of saying we need to raise taxes to end the housing gap.  He then 
         went on - I think that that is the best program for housing clearly 
         it is a fraction of the total need.  We've always been behind as a 
         country in trying to meet the housing gap.  The last several years 
         I think as a country we have fallen further behind because the 
         economy pushed so many families toward lower incomes.  This is Bill 
         Clinton's own Housing Secretary.  One of the reasons why he's gonna 
         be gone is because he has painted a picture of the economy here 
         that is totally at odds with the picture portrayed by the 
         Clinton/Gore campaign.  That this is the best economy in the last
         





         30 years.  Now we need to raise taxes to close the housing gap and 
         the housing gap has widened according to Henry Cisneros because the 
         economy has pushed so many families toward lower income.  He's 
         right.  We have the data.  We know that mean household income in 
         this country in men fell two percent in the last four years and in 
         the last year fell one percent among women but it's up 2.3 percent 
         if you get a government handout check.  Welfare, Social Security -
         something like that, your income is up.  Government transfer 
         payments are up - just thought you would like to know that.  John 
         Leo, same issue of U.S. News, Nov.11th has his own society column. 
         Talks about the curiosities that surround Proposition 209 in 
         California.  This is the civil right initiative, it would end 
         discrimination in the State of California.  Let me read this to 
         you.  Here again, this is the wording - The state, if I were Red 
         Skeleton I would define each couple of words as I go, the state, in 
         this case boys and girls, California, the official organization and 
         structure of the people who live within the boundaries of the 
         geographic region of our country known as California.  The state 
         and all the institutions that are of the state, this does not 
         include the private sector, you must understand this - this is like 
         state universities, state government, state awarded contracts to 
         businesses and anything the state is involved in is what is 
         affected here - all right.  Now the state has nothing to do with 
         maternity benefits, nothing of the sort.  Now here we go - well 
         alimony you know that sort of stuff, the state shall not 
         discriminate against or grant preferential treatment to any 
         individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or 
         national origin.  This is the same - I mean this is it, it's 
         against discrimination.  It's everybody, it's everybody that has 
         anything to do with the state.  Now if the EIB Network was located 
         in California, it wouldn't have anything to do with us, unless the 
         state provided us the studio or the state was somehow involved in 
         what we do and fortunately we have not gotten to that point but I 
         don't know about the next four years.  It's just a state, it's all 
         these fear tactics out there.  Now keep that in mind, this is just
         





         about the state.  It has to do with state hiring, state university 
         admissions, state awarded contracts,                    .  Got 
         that.  John Leo has dug up some research here by a man named 
         Michael Lynch of the Pacific Research Institute.  Now what is 
         affirmative action.  You must understand what affirmative action. 
         Affirmative action simply says this - that if 38 percent of the 
         population if Latino, then 38 percent of the jobs, college 
         admissions, state awarded contracts go to Latinos.  If the 
         population is 55 percent women, then 55 percent of the jobs, 55 
         percent of the state awarded contracts, 55 percent of the 
         admissions at universities go to women.  If the population is 10 
         percent Vietnamese pot-bellied pig, then 10 percent of all state 
         award contracts, admissions, whatever it is goes to 10 percent 
         Vietnamese pot bellied pigs if you're going to grant them human 
         status.  That's what affirmative action is.  It defines its quotas. 
         They don't want to admit that it's quotas but it's quotas.  Now you 
         must understand what that is in order to understand what next 
         comes.  Here we go - Michael Lynch of the Pacific Research 
         Institute analyzed the distribution of California Civil Service 
         jobs using the standards that U.S. Supreme Court says must be used 
         - that is relevant labor force data, not general labor force 
         numbers.  Lynch found that since 1976 in California, Blacks, who 
         were already over represented in the Civil Service increased their 
         proportion by 132 percent, Whites, under represented in 1976 
         decreased in their percentage by 63 percent.  Lynch's study shows 
         that under parity, or proportionality, the professed goal of anti 
         209ers, Blacks would loose 10,362 state jobs, Filipinos would loose 
         3,606 state jobs and women would loose 7,413 jobs because that's 
         how over represented these groups all ready are in California based 
         on the percentage of the population.  So if 209 goes down to      
                (sounds like deveat) and the 209 opponents say  no, we don't 
         want this, according to the law - according to their own 
         guidelines, this number of Blacks, Filipinos and women would have 
         to be fired in order to make things equal.  You understand this. 
         As John Leo writes - think about this, besides being a disastrous
         





         new ideal for America, group rights in California state hiring 
         means that the one major group with a historical claim of 
         systematic oppression - Blacks, would loose ground.  The benefits 
         would go to a group with no such claim and which in any case is a 
         largely new immigrant population.  Affirmative action for new 
         arrivals.  Why.  Why.  Why.  This is incredible.  The people that 
         are opposing 209 already have according to their own guideline a 
         greater percentage of each group holding jobs than their own guide-
         lines call for and because of that their people would loose jobs in 
         order to make sure that the population were represented fairly and 
         proportionally in the state in these civic civil service gigs.  
         Now the latest polling data on 209 says that the amount of support 
         for it is actually surging.  A majority now favor the measure that 
         would ban racial and gender preferences.  It's a Field Survey -
         Mervin Field.  Fifty-two percent said they favor the measure, 38 
         percent opposed, 10 percent said they are undecided.  Quick break. 
         Your calls are next on the special non-partisan edition of the Rush 
         Limbaugh program on election day.  You're listening to the EIB 
         Network.  You're tuned to the talk station WWDB. 
         Commercials
         Rush L - And now back to the phones.  This is the EIB Network, the 
         Rush Limbaugh program and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced 
         Conservative Studies.  Paulette from Ft. Meyers, Florida, welcome 
         to the program. 
         Paulette - Hi Rush.  Non-partisan election day dittoes from Ft. 
         Meyers. 
         Rush L -  Thanks for the call.  Welcome to our special non-partisan 
         edition of the EIB Networks Rush Limbaugh program.  Great to have 
         you with us.  
         Paulette - Thanks.  First time caller, first try.  This is awesome. 
         Rush L - Way to go, it must be an omen.  Who did you vote for. 
         Paulette -  Absolutely Dole. 
         Rush L -  On this basis ladies and gentlemen - this is more than 
         one call from the State of Florida today.  Early exit poll analysis 
         enables us to project Florida for Senator Bob Dole.  
         





         Paulette - Absolutely.
         Rush L - Thank you Paulette, very much for your call.  Well what's 
         up. 
         Paulette - Hey I watch Monday night football all the time and last 
         night I was disgusted by the half time side show.  What was that?
         Rush L -  It was a promotion of election night coverage on ABC 
         because they think the presidential race is over and they think 
         they have to hype viewership by pointing out how late they're going 
         to be up covering these house races.
         Paulette -  And I think they're wrong. 
         Rush L - Well our exit polling data clearly indicates they're 
         wrong. 
         Paulette - Absolutely.  And last night I also happened to watch the 
         Perot Informercial. 
         Rush L - Yeah, I watched a little bit of that too. 
         Paulette -  It was very interesting.  He blasted Clinton. 
         Rush L - He really did. I mean he really, he really blasted 
         Clinton.  
         Paulette - No scandals about Dole. 
         Rush L - Yeah, he kinda treated Dole with a Michael Jackson type 
         glove, but he went after .....  By the way do you believe Michael 
         Jackson has actually impregnated a woman?
         Paulette - Hadn't heard that one. 
         Rush L -  Yeah, it's all over the news.  
         Paulette -  I don't listen to the news anymore.  I just listen to 
         you. 
         Rush L -  Well I'll tell you all about it here in due course. 
         There are other more pressing matters.  But the Perot informercial 
         last night, the only thing wrong with it was that Perot has said 
         all those things from the heart at a podium without a teleprompter. 
         Last night's reading the prompter and he looked like he was reading 
         the prompter more last night than I have ever seen him.  
         Paulette -  Yes he did.
         Rush L -  But boy what he had to say.  He was just all over this 
         scandal stuff, all over it with......  Well as usual I said
         





         he's....  obviously he has listened to this show in the past couple 
         of weeks.
         Paulette -  That's right.  That's right. 
         Rush L -  Did you think that too?  Did you think.....
         Paulette - I did absolutely.  I was telling my husband about it. 
         He got home from a meeting and I was telling him about it, and he 
         said well he's been listening to Rush, absolutely. 
         Rush -  Not that he doesn't come up with the stuff independently -
         don't misunderstand, but I mean it was uncanny and you - I don't 
         know how many people watch this stuff but you have to wonder.  He 
         spent $2 million on this last night and obviously his theory is 
         that the closer to the election you say this stuff the more impact 
         it might have.  Why what.  Why did he do it.  Well you tell me. 
         Why do you think that he did it.  Look, you've got to understand 
         something about this.  First and foremost, he knows that he's not 
         going to be elected President but he's I think very, very serious 
         about the creation of this third party - this reform party and he's 
         got to get enough support for it that it survives.  He got to do 
         whatever it takes to make sure this party survives and I actually 
         think that, I actually think that he's..... all things considered, 
         Perot is a decent guy.  He's a little quirky now and then but he's 
         a decent.... I think this scandal stuff offends him tremendously. 
         I think he's just like any of the rest of us, to understand that 
         the highest office in the land has been sold out these past four 
         years.  It probably grates on him as much as it's grating on 
         anybody, maybe more so considering his four year assault on special 
         interest and so forth.  I think he's really offended that the 
         highest office of the land has been sold out like this.  Tammy -
         Paulette, thanks for the call.  Back now to our non-partisan 
         special election presentation.  Ken, in Nashville, Tennessee, 
         welcome to the program sir, nice to hear from you.
         Ken - Thanks Rush.  Mega election day dittos from the volunteer 
         state, which is going to go for Dole/Kemp. 
         Rush L - You've voted for Dole/Kemp?
         Ken - Have voted for Dole/Kemp and had an opportunity to be at the
         





         rally last night in Knoxville, approximately 4 to 5 thousand very 
         excited voters there last night and there is no sign of strong 
         support for Clinton in Tennessee.  It's very soft.  We're building 
         a bridge to the 21st Century - we're not only going to go for 
         Dole/Kemp this year, we're going to make sure that Al Gore doesn't 
         have a solid chance at re-election in the year 2000.  I think that 
         we need to take this election seriously.  America needs to get out 
         and vote because it is not over and when Tennessee goes for 
         Dole/Kemp that definitely makes a statement. 
         Rush L - Well didn't Tennessee go for the Republicans in toto in 
         1994.  And Gore went in there and gave it his best shot, but he was 
         still a tobacco farmer then.  But now he has gotten rid of that 
         baggage and so who knows what the outcome will be.  Well Ken, thank 
         you, thanks for the phone call.  I've got to tell you something. 
         I still have this dream that tonight..... Look I'm going to an 
         election night party tonight and the people who invited us to it, 
         said come and join with 20 friends to witness the great miracle of 
         1996.  Buffet supper starts 8 o'clock.  So I'm going to go to this 
         place - the great miracle of 1996, and I have got this desire to 
         sit there and watch the blank faces of the network anchors as they 
         try to explain what went wrong with all their data.  It's just one 
         of these things that once in your life you hope you see.  And I'll 
         tell you what folk the ABC, Peter Jennings did call the race in 
         essence last night at half time on Monday night football.  But the 
         fact is a guy here from Tennessee is absolutely correct there 
         are....in fact Nightline Friday night did a story on should the 
         networks project the results of the presidential race before the 
         polls close on the left coast.  And they skirted the main reason 
         why they shouldn't.  They touched on it but not enough.  And I want 
         to expand on that a little bit because it is right in context here 
         with the need here to make sure you vote, because there are so many 
         other elections going on besides the presidential race.  Quick 
         break, back with more in a moment.  Don't go away.
         Commercial
         Rush L -  On the cutting edge of societal evolution, the Rush
         





         Limbaugh, a special non-partisan edition of the Rush Limbaugh 
         program on the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative studies 
         today.  Friday night, Nightline did a special show on - should the 
         networks project the presidential winner when they know it even if 
         it is before the polls close in California.  And we discussed that 
         on this program and when you get down to it, if the networks know, 
         others know and you're not going to be able to keep these people 
         quiet, the Internet types and you know, local broadcasters.  Once 
         somebody knows it - once the exit polling data is in and if 
         everybody is going to swear by it and they've got it, they're going 
         to run with it.  But there is something here that does have to be 
         taken into account when talking about left coast voters and that is 
         you think I'm looking at California, like I told you my friends, I 
         do show prep in a far more circuitous and thorough way than most 
         hosts have even thought about.  I watch the West Coast feeds of 
         certain network broadcasts just to get a feel for the LA/San 
         Francisco/Seattle/Portland markets just to find out and you learn 
         so much from advertising in addition to local news.  And you go out 
         there and take a look at all of the ballot initiatives in 
         California for example that are being contested.  I mean the number 
         of political ads in California for ballot initiatives dwarfs the 
         number of ads for Clinton/Gore and Dole/Kemp.  These issues are 
         just as important to Californians as the presidential race in many 
         cases.  So if you're driving to the polling place - California, you 
         hear that the presidential race has been decided because of a 
         network projection based on exit polling data, are you more or less 
         inclined to go to the polls and vote on the local issues.  In some 
         cases you might say yeah, because these local issues have much more 
         draw than the presidential race - people are going to vote on those 
         anyway no matter what because they're not projected - because 
         nobody knows.  But that is something to consider in all this and 
         the thing that came out of Friday's show - the zinger that came out 
         of the Nightline Show is this, that the networks -  and I'm not 
         talking about Koppel.  Koppel introduced some staff people at the 
         network which deal in this - their whole job is to analyze data
         





         both pre-election and exit polling data and come up with enough 
         iron-clad info to make a projection.  The clear conclusion was that 
         the networks don't mind at all influencing the outcome of things. 
         And that is the bottom line - they don't mind at all influencing 
         the outcome of things because they say it can't be helped.  They 
         don't mind influencing - in other words this is how you influence 
         the outcome.  Let's say you're in line - let's say you're standing 
         in a long line in California to vote and the word spreads - hey, 
         ABC just projected Dole to win the presidency and you're so stunned 
         and you can't believe it, you just say, the hell with this, I'm 
         just going home especially if you're a Clinton supporter.  Hell 
         with this, I'm going...... you leave and you don't vote in the 
         local issues out there because of a projection that has been made 
         in the presidential race.  And the networks say - we can't - hey 
         look, our job is to be first with the news when we have it and 
         we've got to trust the intelligence and the civic responsibility of 
         the voters.  It's not our fault if they leave the line.  All true, 
         but still you have to understand that what was admitted indirectly 
         was that the networks do not mind influencing the outcome of 
         events, which we all know that, but I mean to have it stated as 
         close to directly as it was Friday night is amazing.  Alexandria, 
         VA - this is John, you're on the Rush Limbaugh program.  Hello. 
         John -   Hello Rush.  I can't even believe that I got through to 
         you.
         Rush L -  Well believe it, because you did. 
         John - Okay.  The reason I called is because I listened to Perot's 
         argument last night and he just swayed me.  I was committed to 
         voting for Howard Phillips and the U.S. Taxpayers Party, and I was 
         also committed to voting against Senator John               , 
         because I'm mad at him.  But Perot convinced me that we can't, you 
         know, afford four to six more years of.....
         Rush L - So for whom, I say John, for whom ......
         John - Well I had to get on the straight Republican ticket.  I went 
         with Dole and I'm trying to get a Congress for him and a Senate 
         that - - 
         





         Rush L - A question, a question - why did you not vote for Perot if 
         Perot so impressed you last night?
         John - Well I believe anyone that's you know, thinking about this -
         I mean for the same reason that I didn't vote for Howard Phillips -
          that what Perot convinced me not to vote for him.  I mean, he 
         convinced me to vote for Dole, because you know when he went 
         through all this litany of things that you know have been 
         corrupting in government, you know, he was talking about Clinton. 
         He had an obligatory swipe against Dole, but I think that was just 
         because he thought he had to.  And he himself, I think he was 
         talking about getting 25 percent of the vote.  Well, why would I 
         waste my vote on a guy that admits he is only going to get 25 
         percent. 
         Rush L -  And all of this just came to you last night?  You had to 
         be building up to this. 
         John - Well, no, I really support you know, what Howard Phillips 
         has to say you know.  And you know, I was hoping if he made some 
         kind of a showing now it might strengthen his base for the future 
         but I just don't think that can wait.  
         Rush L - Well here you have it my friends and this is an 
         interesting story because it does illustrate how Perot takes votes 
         away from the incumbent and if you saw Perot's informercial last 
         night, there's no question he was going out after Clinton.  And the 
         guy here is right, it was an obligatory swipe at Dole on the sugar 
         money out of Florida.  This was clearly an attack on the incumbent. 
         And so well John thanks for the call.  I appreciate your getting 
         through here.  Glen Rock, New Jersey - Joe you're next on the Rush 
         Limbaugh program, Hello.
         Joe  -  Hello Rush.  It's good to talk to you Rush.  You're making 
         my day.  I got up early this morning to go and vote and this 
         afternoon I got lucky enough first time caller to get through to 
         you. 
         Rush L -  So you voted for Dole?
         Joe -  Oh Absolutely. 
         Rush L -  The exit polling data continues to mount up so it looks
         





         like a Dole sweep ladies and gentlemen. 
         Joe -  That was the easiest vote I ever had.  You know what I 
         wanted to talk to you about Rush - I have been kinda getting 
         nauseous here watching the television with Clinton always bragging 
         about how the economy is doing so good and everything is going 
         well, everyone is doing so good, we're paying more taxes than we've 
         ever paid and what does the government have to do with the economy? 
         Do you know what the government has to do with the economy because 
         I don't know.  All they do is make it hard. 
         Rush L -  I'll give you an example of what..... You know you're 
         right.  No, no, let me not argue with you - you're right.  On 
         balance the government has nothing to do with it - the most the 
         government can do is harm.  But in terms of helping the  less 
         government does the more the economy does well.  But politicians 
         don't define action by counting how little of it  they do.  So 
         you're never going to get them to go along with it.  Bit Herb 
         Stein, the father of Benjamin Stein, who had a story in last week's 
         Wall Street Journal about if Nixon had had no shame.  Benjamin 
         Stein today writes a piece - How do we know we're better off than 
         we were four years ago.  How many of us have sat down and put a 
         pencil and paper to our financial circumstances of the past four 
         years and actually and actually come to a mathematically financial 
         conclusion  that we're better off.  His projection is that nobody 
         has done that.  So what are people using as the basis for saying 
         they're doing better now than they were four years ago.  And Herb 
         Stein said its feelings. It's feelings.  People feel better, 
         confident, what have you.  And this goes right back to what we were 
         discussing earlier about the soccer mom, and that is that Bill 
         Clinton - and your question too Joe, what's Clinton done for the 
         economy - nothing, but he somehow has made people feel Okay about 
         it.  People's feelings are what are the determining factors here. 
         I think it's a good point and there is a lesson in there for - I've 
         said this many times - the Republicans in the budget battle for 
         example, too much green eye shade, too many numbers, the growth 
         rates, this and that and so forth and the opponents didn't deal
         





         with numbers at all.  The opponents made audacious statements, 
         audacious claims - said we're going to do this, and this, and this 
         and then after a pass of time claimed credit for it whether it 
         happened or not.  And all of it is based on good vibes, good 
         feelings and so forth and in the meantime we're still running 
         around talking about we inched down here, we inched up there, and 
         numbers are tough to follow anyway and there is nothing sexy about 
         em.  But there are the ultimate proof and since we are people of 
         reason and we want to persuade people with reason and not to get 
         them on emotion we keep pummelling with numbers, hoping that 
         they'll understand the facts and the truth about it all.  Quick 
         break.  We'll be back with more on this special non-partisan 
         edition of the Rush Limbaugh election day special after this. 
         Commercial
         Rush L -  Back on the phones now on the Rush Limbaugh program, EIB 
         Network on election day.  Bruce in Tucson - Hi sir.  
         Bruce - Hi Rush.  Good to talk to you. 
         Rush L - Thank you very much.  Nice to hear from you. 
         Bruce - Just wanted you to know that I'm a life long Democrat, 53 
         years of age, have always voted straight Democrat until today.  I 
         voted straight Republican and my wife did too and we will continue 
         to do so.
         Rush L -  Whew. Wow, our exit polling data from Arizona is piling 
         up fast.  Not yet able to make a projection there but we're getting 
         closer.  What was it that turned your vote?
         Bruce -  Liberalism does not work.  It's as simple as that. 
         Rush L -  So you feel abandoned by the Democratic Party in essence.
         Bruce -  Most definitely.  Most definitely
         Rush L - This is really the first time you've voted a Republican 
         ticket. 
         Bruce -  Yes sir. 
         Rush L - Well welcome home.  I mean I tell you I love new friends.
         Bruce -  Well, we appreciate it. 
         Rush L - Thank you very much Bruce. 
         Bruce -  You bet. 
         





         Rush L - Appreciate the phone call.  There is a lot of people I 
         guess carrying around a lot of baggage who want to rid themselves 
         of if; to be able to go into this season feeling free of mind. 
         They want to rid themselves of the terrible weighty burden of 
         guilt.  So they do two things.  They vote and then call here to 
         tell the world what they've done.  Hastings, Minnesota - Bonnie, 
         hello, welcome to the program.  
         Bonnie -  Hi Rush.  Nice to talk to you. 
         Rush L - Hi.  Nice to hear from you too.
         Bonnie - We turned on to you a couple of years ago from my brother 
         in Sacramento, Mike and my mom here in Hastings.  And it's been 
         great, it's been a relief hearing what you say. 
         Rush L - Thank you, thank you.  You tell them I appreciate all 
         they've done.  
         Bonnie -  I'm calling because I work for the Post Office and a 
         poster went up in the break room a couple of days ago.  And it is 
         a woman with a tear in her eye coming down her cheek and it says 
         Congress does not have to explain to your family about 
         privatization, you do.  Get out there and vote.  You know and the 
         implication  - and you know it's right above the trash can on the 
         wall and I felt like throwing it in the trash.
         Rush L -  What is the implication.  What implication are you 
         drawing, what inference should I say are you drawing?
         Bonnie - Well the liberalness of it all that - you know the poster 
         is made by the union -
         Rush L -  But do you feel threatened by this poster in any way?
         Bonnie -  I feel insulted.  My intelligence.  I wanted to throw it 
         in the trash can.  It was insulting to intelligent people, because 
         I know the truth about it.  I'm willing to go privatization to do 
         what needs to be done.  I have no fear about loosing my job.  I 
         work, I do my job.  I work hard.....
         Rush L -  And you're proud and happy to judged on the merits of 
         your performance.  You're afraid of nothing. 
         Bonnie -  Definitely.  I've gotten a lot of jobs.  I've quit jobs 
         left and right, you know exploring and doing other things and I've
         





         never had trouble finding another job. 
         Rush L -  Bonnie this is great.  I'm flattered that you called. 
         Bonnie - Oh it's great.  This is the first time I've ever tried. 
         It has taken me two hours to do it today but
         Rush L - Well congratulations.  Persistence pays off - another 
         sterling quality you no doubt possess that enables you to get the 
         job done.  Terrific.  Thanks very much for the phone call. 
         Appreciate it.  You've got to ask yourself a question, when the 
         Republicans hold the house, what will big labor leaders say to 
         their union membership.  Because after big labor has attempted to 
         destroy the careers of 75 Republicans in order to buy the House of 
         Representatives and when tonight it is known that that effort 
         failed, what can be big labor expect from Republicans in response. 
         Not targeted but why should the   Republicans be friendly to big 
         labor now.  Why should they, why should they, I mean labor rank and 
         file is gonna have to wonder here.  All this money and they were 
         unable to buy Congress.  They've got a lot of things they've got to 
         ask about.  Quick break.  We'll be back with more in just a second. 
         Don't go away. 
         Commercial
         Rush L - It's the EIB Network and our special non-partisan election 
         day special on the Rush Limbaugh program and we have with us on the 
         phone ladies and gentlemen vice presidential candidate on the 
         Republican ticket, Jack Kemp.  Welcome to the program sir. 
         Jack K - Hey Rush.  How're you doing man.
         Rush L - I'm superb.  Where are you today. 
         Jack K -  I'm on a freeway in Los Angeles, going out to Pepperdine 
         University with my wife and son and John Mackey of the Baltimore 
         Colts and we're having a great time.  I was in Cape Girard and saw 
         your...  is your brother David?  
         Rush L -  Yeah
         Jack K -  Yeah, I saw Dave in Cape Girard.  I even quoted the great 
         Rush Limbaugh. 
         Rush L -  No kidding.  Well you know he called.  He was all excited 
         you were coming to town.  He has admired you, I've got to tell you,
         





         he's admired you for more years than you know. 
         Jack K - Well it was a lot of fun.  Well thank you.  I was sorry I 
         didn't get to meet your mom. 
         Rush L -  Well she's sorry too. I'm surprised it didn't happen, 
         that she wasn't there to greet you off the airplane first
         Jack K -  Well the weather wasn't that good at the moment but ....
         What's going on?
         Rush L - Well I'll tell you what.  We're conducting our own exit 
         polls strategy here and we've projected West Virginia, and a 
         township in Michigan so far...
         Jack K -  Oh good ....
         Rush L -  And we close to Florida.  I mean seriously I got so many 
         Democrats that have called today saying that they have switched, 
         that they're not going for this anymore.  I don't know how much we 
         can make it.  We're having a lot of fun here.  The mood is up. 
         People are enthusiastic and they're positive and I think...
         Jack K -  Well I am too Rush.  I tell you we've been all over the 
         country - from Florida and Missouri to Tennessee, Ohio and now 
         California.  I think people really respect the effort that Bob Dole 
         has made in the past and is making today and for the last 96 hours 
         and I think they want a president that they can trust, a president 
         of whom they can feel proud and who will restore honor and 
         integrity and character to the White House. 
         Rush L -  Amen to that.  And that seems to be the message that 
         everybody calling here is echoing.  Now are you in California for 
         the day.  Is this where you're...
         Jack K  - We've been in California for the last 24 hours and we're 
         going to a final get out the vote rally at Pepperdine University in 
         Santa Monica, California and then go back and start watching the 
         returns. 
         Rush L -  Where are you going to be doing that - have you got a 
         hotel suite?
         Jack K  - Yeah, we're at the Hyatt and the Marriott in Irvine, 
         California.  I was born in LA and my wife Joann was born in       
                  , California, Ventura County, California so it's kind of
         





         a home coming.  We've got all of our family here and John Mackey of 
         the Baltimore Colts, Dr.                  , the president of Howard 
         University and Bob Woodson from the Center for Neighborhood 
         Enterprise.                  Bennett is coming out later today he 
         and his wife Elaine, so we're going to be among family, friends and 
         old football comrades in arms. 
         Rush L -  I remember you saying before you were asked to be on the 
         ticket - you were saying you were getting ready to head off into a 
         different area of life - how has the experience been.  Has it been 
         what you thought it would be, have you enjoyed it?
         Jack K -  I've really enjoyed it.  I don't mean to be giddy about 
         it; I'm not giddy, but Joann and I have had a wonderful time.  Men 
         and women of faith, Jew, Gentile. Catholic, Protestant, Black, 
         White - all over the country - praying for the leadership of this 
         nation and wanting to restore the type of honor and credibility, 
         domestically and in foreign policy, upon which our nation was built 
         and certainly upon which the Reagan revolution was built.  I 
         believe Bob Dole clearly will put this country on the right track 
         for the 21st century.  
         Rush L -  Now you live in Washington but you travel around a lot...
         Jack K - We have lived in Bethesda, Maryland.  We've lived there 
         every since I went to Congress in 1970 of course I've played 
         football for the San Diego Chargers and the Buffalo Bills, so we 
         have lived in a lot of different cities.  inaudible               
                                                                  .   
         Washington, D.C. our nation's capital ought to be an Enterprise 
         Zone; it won't happen under Bill Clinton - it will happen under Bob 
         Dole and Jack Kemp. 
         Rush L - Well, you've seen a lot of America.  What (we have 30 
         seconds here) what impressions have you noted that have changed in 
         this campaign you have been out....
         Jack K -  I think after the World Series, after the Yankees won the 
         World Series with all due respect to the Braves, I think people 
         began to focus in on what type of a White House, what type of a 
         country, what type of a Congress and I believe we will recapture
         





         the Congress but they really got tired of the Indonesian scandal, 
         the Taiwanese money coming into America, the Russian - the stories 
         of the White House being put up for sale and I believe they're 
         going to restore respect to the White House by electing Bob Dole 
         the next president. 
         Rush L - Thank you for the call.  We're out of time.  That's Jack 
         Kemp in California.  This a special non-partisan edition of the 
         Rush Limbaugh election day program.
         Commercial and News
         Rush L - Hello my friends, how are you.  It's nice to have you 
         along.  This is the Rush Limbaugh program on the excellence in 
         broadcasting network, we come to you today direct from the Limbaugh 
         Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.  I'm firmly ensconced 
         behind this - The golden EIB microphone broadcast excellence -
         another hour of it straight ahead. 
         Telephone number is 800-282-2882.  Nice to have you along my 
         friends. Federal regulations require that all electioneering and 
         partisanship cease  on commercial broadcast facilities during 
         election day - during the hours that the polls are open.  And the 
         only place the polls are not open when this program is on the air 
         is Guam.  However, my friends there are ways around the federal 
         regulations and one of the ways around is simply to proclaim that 
         this is not a partisan broadcast.  So therefore we are abiding by 
         all federal regulations. There is no partisanship on the program 
         today.  This is a special non-partisan edition of the Rush Limbaugh 
         program.  We just concluded a conversation in a purely non-partisan 
         way with Republican Vice Presidential candidate Jack Kemp last 
         hour.  Now to show that we are balanced and to prove that this is 
         a non-partisan program - we're not here to anger anybody, clearly 
         we're not here to tick anybody off.  We will now as we have been 
         doing all day, feature a campaign speech from a member of the 
         Democratic Party since we have spoken early today to Vice President 
         Candidate Jack Kemp.  Here, ladies and gentlemen from one of his 
         most well-known and famous campaign appearances in Texas is Bill 
         Clinton.
         





         Bill Clinton - I have been trying to think of a diplomatic way to 
         ask for one of these pick-ups behind me.  I owned, when I was a 
         younger man and had a life I owned an El Cameno pick up in the 
         70's. It was a real sort of southern deal.  I had astro turf in the 
         back.  You don't want to know why but I did.
         Rush L - That was from back in the 70's when he says he had a life. 
         Not wife, he meant life that was pre-wife.  Bill Clinton in a 
         campaign speech reminiscing about the good old days with astro turf 
         in the back of his El Cameno.  Special non-partisan edition of Rush 
         Limbaugh program.  Some of you apparently don't know this.  Based 
         on a call we got earlier in the program, Michael Jackson claims he 
         is going to be a father and that he has impregnated the women.  It 
         was not artificial but it was real. The woman's name is Debbie 
         Rowe.  She is 37 years old and she will bear his child.  Said 
         Michael Jackson, I'm thrilled that I will soon be a father and am 
         looking forward with great anticipation to having this child.  This 
         is my dream come true.  Billy Jean - you can make of that whatever 
         you wish being that this is a non-partisan program today ladies and 
         gentlemen no comments will be forth coming from me.  Santa Monica, 
         California, an 18 year old high school senior, working at the court 
         house where O.J. Simpson's civil trial is going on, says she is 
         upset and scared, because O.J. Simpson has been asking her out and 
         sexually harassing her.  At least 3 times spectators and court 
         officials have seen O.J. Simpson demonstrate suggestive  behavior 
         to blonde, blue eyed Amber McGrath, a paid intern who works half 
         days helping the court administrator.  McGrath said that Simpson 
         invited her to his home last Thursday for a Halloween party.  So 
         what are you doing tonight, McGrath says he asked her, why don't 
         you come over to my place and party said O.J.  McGrath turned him 
         down.  Here he is at the trial involving the death of his ex-wife 
         who he was supposed to be in love with and he's hitting on me, she 
         says.  McGrath did nothing to encourage the situation so goes the 
         story.  She had been doing a fabulous job.  She was instructed to 
         have no contacts with the parties in this and she has been 
         following instructions.   So, O.J. Simpson attempting to hit on an
         





         18 year old, as it says here, blonde, blue eyed intern at the court 
         house.  This is a non-partisan program and therefore there'll  no 
         comment.  What are you saying Mr. Snerdly.  I don't know why -
         obviously she doesn't think that he's innocent.  Mr. Snerdly asked 
         why is she scared, obviously he is innocent.  Apparently she 
         doesn't think so.  This is a story out of San Diego.  Cabinet 
         members Henry Cisneros and Federico Pena canceled their appearance 
         at a Latino get out the vote rally yesterday, after protesters took 
         over the bandstand at Chicano Park.  About 30 supports of the Rousa 
         Rights Coalition gathered in Chicano Park before the scheduled 3:30 
         P.M. start time, said they would not allow the two highest ranking 
         Latinos in the Clinton administration  to speak.  They claimed that 
         Clinton and the Democratic Party have not done enough to help 
         Hispanics.  With its colorful murals covering the concrete pillars 
         beneath the Coranado Bridge, Chicano Park is a powerful  symbol to 
         some activists of a Hispanic struggle against oppression.  Denise 
         Marino DuChaney, a Democrat Assembly Woman in the State of 
         California said I think it's unfortunate that San Diego won't get 
         to see Cisneros and Pena.  It's ironic that this rally would have 
         talked about Prop 209 and minority rights.  I don't know quite what 
         the purpose of the protest is.  About 100 people had gathered in 
         the park to watch the scheduled entertainment and participate in 
         the rally which was canceled by 30 irate Latinos.  I want to read 
         to you a quote here from a protester - a high school senior, named 
         Rubin Guttearis.  "I could understand where the anger is coming 
         from because Prop 187 and Prop 209 was brought up by Pete Wilson 
         and people like him.  They say that Prop 209 will make things 
         equal.  Well eliminating Affirmative Action is going to eliminate 
         our rights" said Rubin Guttearis.  Mr. Guttearis, in case you're 
         skipping school today like you were yesterday and are by chance 
         listening to this program let me say something to you sir.  Your 
         statement that eliminating Affirmative Action is going to eliminate 
         your rights is wrong.  What you really mean is - and admit this 
         sir, admit this - what you really mean is that eliminating 
         Affirmative Action is going to eliminate your special privileges,
         





         because he has been documented that in the State of California, in 
         civic civil service jobs, state oriented jobs, Latinos would loose 
         thousands of jobs of Prop 209 were defeated.  The reason is that 
         Affirmative Action requires an equal representation - proportionate 
         representation to the population figures in jobs and in college 
         admissions and there are already more Latinos in these civil 
         service jobs are required under proportionate requirements based on 
         the population.  So some Latinos would have to be fired.  In 
         addition 10,362 Blacks would have to loose their jobs, 7,413 women 
         and 3,606 Filipinos if Prop 209 were defeated.  See if Prop 209 is 
         passed all these people keep their jobs because their skin color 
         doesn't matter.  It's amazing, it's amazing, these people are just 
         absolute whackos.  They're pure whackos.  But here's a guy, 18 year 
         old, who has been totally bought.  He's had his mind totally brain 
         washed by this whole concept here.  San Francisco story here - a 
         governing board of San Francisco approved legislation Monday that 
         would bar San Francisco from signing contracts with companies that 
         do not offer the same benefits to domestic partners as married 
         couples.  This is a proposal that Willie Brown is very proud of. 
         The mayor is likely to sign the legislation - the mayor supports 
         the concept of equal rights and benefits for domestic partners.  He 
         won't sign until he has seen it, but in concept the mayor is very 
         supportive.  It's the kind of legislation the mayor is likely to 
         sign.  So here is the City of San Francisco telling businesses how 
         they must  run if they expect to do business with the city and if 
         this goes against the grain of the morality of the company, so be 
         it.  They must cave to the declining morality of the City of San 
         Francisco.  Quick break here folks and back with more voters as our 
         exit poll continues on this special non-partisan edition of the 
         Rush Limbaugh election day program.  
         Commercials
         Rush L -  We are back, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, 800-282-
         2882.  You know there has been a lot of talk the past couple of 
         days about the President's push for 50 percent of the vote and 
         people have been saying he wants a mandate.  He wants a mandate to
         





         be able to go out there and do battle with a potentially Republican 
         Congress, Republican Senate.  He wants to make sure he has the 
         power of the people.  Folks that's all smoke; that is all BS; that 
         is all Barbara Striesand.  Let me tell you right now the one and 
         only reason why Bill Clinton wants 50 percent.  If he gets 50 or 
         more percent, he can go on television Wednesday afternoon and claim 
         that the voters of America have acquitted him and his friends of 
         all charges.  If he gets 50 percent of the vote in a three way 
         race, he will be able to go to the American people and say - see 
         these are tired of all this pursuing me, these things that are 
         irrelevant and don't matter, they've held us back.  We've got to 
         build a bridge to the 21st Century.  And the voters have said they 
         want all of this stuff just swept away, it not productive.  They 
         want to get rid of it and I'm hereby pardoning everybody because 
         the people have demanded it.  It would be tougher to do that but he 
         would still do it.  Don't misunderstand but it would be tougher to 
         do with say 43, 44 - it would be tougher to say the American people 
         have said X with less than 50 percent.  If he gets 50 percent of 
         the vote - that's what he is running around.  He wants a Democratic 
         Congress.  BS, that's not what he's doing.  He doesn't care about 
         a Democratic Congress - he cares about his lily-white rear end. 
         And now our special non-partisan  election day special continues. 
         Here is Paul in Salem, Ohio.  Welcome to the EIB Network sir. 
         Paul -  Rush, mega non-partisan dittos from Mahoney County, the 
         district of Jimmy Trafica.  In fact he has a farm about 1/4 mile 
         down the road from me. 
         Rush L -  Thank you for the call sir, and do you ever say hi to 
         him?
         Paul -  Yes I do, in fact I have an antique car and I stopped to 
         see him one day and my car wouldn't start and he pushed it - by 
         hand. 
         Rush L -  Well now, there is a strong guy.  There is a guy not 
         appealing to people on the verge of tears. 
         Paul -  Yes.  He is a non-partisan, Democrat, Congressman. 
         Rush L - I know, yeah, I do know that, yes. 
         





         Paul -  Once in a while, I'll see him on his tractor with a straw 
         hat with an adult beverage - at least I think it is an adult 
         beverage.  
         Rush L -  Well you're looking at from a long distance.  You're 
         really not  sure what kind of beverage that is. 
         Paul -  No, I'm not sure, but I think it probably is.  What I 
         wanted to bring up was Soccor Mom Syndrome.  
         Rush L  -  Soccor Mom Syndrome.
         Paul - Year, I think what it, it is another one of the liberal 
         media ploy,  it is another straw they're piling ont the camel's 
         back.  They have.  Who's going to be against a soccor mom, or what 
         a soccor mom stands for.  And who is going to be for An angry White 
         male.
         Rush L - You know, I think you have a point.  I got a call from 
         some reporter the other day and I didn't talk to them because 
         obviously he had never listened to the program but he wanted to 
         know where the angry White men of 1994 have gone and who are these 
         Soccer Moms and you've nailed it.  They now want to replace the 
         Angry White men who gave us Republicans with the loving, 
         compassionate, heart felt support of the Soccer Moms.  You're 
         right, who could oppose the Soccer Mom - they're out there with the 
         kids, they're out at the grocery store, they're helping the kids 
         fight off the evils of society.  Yeah, you've got a good point 
         there. 
         Paul -  Yeah, Mom, apple pie and you know, the whole bit.  
         Rush L - Bill Clinton. 
         Paul -  And Rush one more thing.  Put Ohio in the win call. My wife 
         and I both voted for Dole this morning.  
         Rush L -  So that two, that two votes - I think on the basis of our 
         exit polling data so far, your two votes are able, we are therefore 
         able with your two votes to project Bob Dole the winner in Ohio 
         based on our exit polling sample on the Rush Limbaugh  program 
         today.  So, so far we have given Dole, Dole is the winner  in 
         Florida, Ohio, Tennessee and Glen Arbor Township in Michigan. 
         Still too soon to call the state  of Michigan.  But we have called
         





         Glen Arbor Township for Dole.  I don't know how many more states 
         we're going to be able to rack up here before our program ends in 
         about 1/2 hour.  But our exit polling data continues to pile and it 
         looks like a much better day for Bob Dole than any of the experts 
         had forecast.  Teaneck, New Jersey - a cellular call from Maurice 
         or Morris.  Which is it?
         Maurice -  Maurice.  Immigrant Maurice was originally from Italy. 
         Mauritso would be an Italian but be that as it may.  Let me just 
         say that I think the Republicans in spite what has been said 
         previously and what I thought previously, I think they ran a very 
         smart race.  They held the personal attack ads till late, came out 
         with them strong and I think that will make a difference.  I of 
         course voted late today - I voted strict Republican down the line. 
         But  Rush, I want to ask you a question about Camille Polyer and 
         what did you think of her. And did you see her speak before Yale 
         (?)
         Rush L  - I didn't see - when did she speak before ....
         Maurice - I believe it was Saturday or Sunday ...
         Rush L - No,  I didn't see it. 
         Maurice -  It might have been a repeat but I thought she was 
         wonderful and she recommended that all women learn football.  And 
         that the next President of the United States was going to be a 
         female and was going to be a football fan.  She was a very 
         interesting speaker and I was very much enthralled with her. 
         Rush L - I have met Camille Polyer.  Let me tell you what happened. 
         I'd long been aware of her.  I had seen her on C-Span, I'd seen her 
         make speeches, 60 Minutes did a profile where Gloria Steinmann got 
         mad at her.  I love anybody that makes these feminists mad and 
         Camille Polyer - the thing I noticed about her - she is a rapid 
         fire speaker - sounds like fast forward or rewind  on your cassette 
         tape recorder but she never stutters or stumbles over anything.  So 
         I am invited  by 60 Minutes  to the 25th Anniversary Party of 60 
         Minutes which was held at the Museum of Modern Art, high on Fifth 
         Avenue at 83rd Street, here in Manhattan.  They held this party in 
         one of the exhibits, the Kingdom of Tumbor or Dum Dum or whatever
         





         it is, I can't remember the name of the exhibit.  What is it - I 
         can't remember it - and I don't mean to be insulting to it - I just 
         don't know what it was, don't remember it.  A lot of people who 
         were there were people who had been profiled by 60 Minutes and I 
         had been which is why I was invited.  They sat me at a table with 
         Camille Polyer, Maurice.  Steve Croft was behind us I later 
         learned.  The idea was that I am this supposed anti-woman, anti-
         feminist hating monster and here is Camille Polyer, apparently the 
         epitome of the antithesis of me.  So they seat us together and the 
         first thing Camille Polyer does is come over and start talking to 
         me about how much she respects what I do on the basis of the First 
         Amendment.  She thinks that it is horrible what people are saying 
         about me and she says that everybody at the table ought to listen 
         to Rush Limbaugh.  I was so moved - I gave her a fine premium cigar 
         and she smoked it.  And of course, I suspect nothing at the 
         beginning, I suspect nothing because I think the best of everybody. 
         I think well this is interesting, I'm sitting her with Camille 
         Polyer - but that was the only questionable person at the table in 
         terms of you know enemies - you know Tony Guida, a local anchor of 
         Channel 2 in New York was there, a couple of CBS types, and then 
         Camille Polyer.  And during the dinner only 60 Minutes types keep 
         strolling around the room casually hanging around my table.  Croft 
         comes over.  Andy Looney, is sitting at the next table over. 
         Charles Kerualt, they're all wavering around, and I said what's 
         going on around here.  They're expecting fire works.  They arranged 
         this seating arrangements so that there would be fireworks at their 
         bash.  And they were stunned, ladies and gentlemen, that Camille 
         Polyer and I would get along.  They were absolutely stunned,  That 
         is my only personal contact with her and I found her to be 
         enjoyable.  She does somethings that I think are - as I'm sure she 
         would say about me - she's got some things about her that I don't 
         particularly agree with, but she is dead right on about the 
         feminist movement and how phony it is and how misleading it is for 
         women and she does not only believe football, she thinks that rock 
         and roll is a fundamental aspect of the formulation  of anybody's
         





         decent personality.  We could argue about that.  But she does think 
         that football is the best way for women to learn to understand men. 
         Get into football, enjoy it and you'll understand  everything you 
         need to know about men, and she may have a point.  Are we that 
         simple though?
         Commercials
         Rush L - The Excellence in Broadcasting Network and the Rush 
         Limbaugh program - get this ladies and gentlemen.  A television 
         station in Fresno, KSEE-TV, it the NBC affiliate there, says that 
         they will pass up broadcasting network projections in the election. 
         The General Manager again is Marty Edelman,  He said that viewers 
         who want network projections of the presidential winner, will have 
         to turn to other stations because his will not carry them. The idea 
         is to avoid discouraging voters who might stay away from polls 
         thinking that their ballot no longer count in electing the 
         president. There's one TV station in Fresno not going to run 
         Brokaw's projections tonight.  Here is Frances in Independence, 
         Missouri - Harry Truman country.  Hello. 
         Frances - Yes.  Hello.  I've never ... I tried to call in.  This is 
         the first time and I think my husband had something to do with it 
         because he is up above right now.  And he was going to vote for 
         Dole and Kemp like we did.  This is the first time we've done this. 
         We've always been Democrats. 
         Rush L - Really. 
         Frances -  And my daughter is going to vote for Dole and Kemp after 
         work. 
         Rush L - We're able to project Independence, Missouri for Bob Dole, 
         ladies and gentlemen, that precinct.  What changed your mind?
         Frances -  The nonsense that has been going on for four years and 
         it's just torture for me and my husband too, of course like I said 
         he just passed away July lst.  But he was hoping to vote for them 
         and he always listened to you and he got me started, and for the 
         last four years or more that's what we've been doing.  And so my 
         daughter voted the other way last time but she said she is going to 
         vote for Kemp and Dole. 
         





         Rush L -  Where does she live?
         Frances -  Right here - about 10 minutes away. 
         Rush L -  That's great.
         Frances -  And I like your program, I have it on every day. 
         Rush L -  Thank you very, very much.  Well, you're very kind to 
         call and I'm very glad that you got through. 
         Frances - On yes, my husband had something to do with it from above 
         I keep telling you. 
         Rush L -  No doubt,.
         Frances - I think he did. 
         Rush L - No doubt. Now you've been a life-long Democrat you say. 
         Frances - Oh yes. 
         Rush L - Now look I don't want you to take this personally but 
         we've been hearing this a lot today and we haven't heard this 
         before today - not nearly in as great a number as we have today. 
         How long have you been upset with the current leadership of the 
         Democratic Party?  
         Frances - Well we noticed that four years ago, but you know Ross 
         Perot was in there, you know, and we said well we'll give that a 
         try.  And we did but my daughter made a big mistake and she voted 
         for the one that's there now. 
         Rush L -  That would be der slickmeister. 
         Frances -  Yes, yes and we never told her dad - because she said 
         don't tell Dad I did this. 
         Rush L -  That's wonderful.  How old is your daughter?
         Frances - She's 37. 
         Rush L - Still concerned with her father's approval. That's what 
         makes America great - at 37 still didn't want to disappoint Dad. 
         Frances - That's right. 
         Rush L -  I love that. 
         Frances - We sure miss him, but anyway he was going to come and 
         vote for him too, but he got me hooked up with you and I've never 
         talked to anybody on long distance before - meaning you...
         Rush L - On a talk show.  Yeah. 
         Frances - That's right and....
         





         Rush L -  Well I'm honored that you chose this show to make your 
         first call to a talk show.
         Frances - Well I could've if my husband would have hooked me up. 
         Rush L - Well he did. 
         Frances - Yes, he did and I really enjoy it and I enjoy all things 
         you say about your wife and you're always so....
         Rush L - So is she, so is she. 
         Frances - Yes, and I'm real happy and I hope that this ticket wins. 
         I really do. 
         Rush L -  Well thank you very much Frances.  It means a lot that 
         you called.  Thanks so much. 
         Frances - Okay.  Thank you. 
         Rush L - Tammy is Oakland, I'm sorry Orland, California.  Tammy 
         welcome to the program.  You're on the Rush Limbaugh show. 
         Tammy - Well dittos Rush. 
         Rush L - Thank you. 
         Tammy - It's great to talk to you again.  
         Rush L - Thank you very much. 
         Tammy - It's been six years. 
         Rush L - Six years?
         Tammy -  Six years
         Rush L - Well, welcome back. 
         Tammy - Still Republican, having a good time today. 
         Rush L - Excellent.  So are we. 
         Tammy - I live right across the street from my polling place and it 
         has been brisk today.  
         Rush L - Has it been busy?
         Tammy - Yes, it has been very busy.  In fact I had to wait because 
         it was standing room only over there. 
         Rush L - You're kidding.  This was no expected - that networks said 
         the turnout would be very, very low. 
         Tammy - Well no one is watching the news.  We're very excited and 
         we just going to wait till after the polls close and then we're 
         going to turn the news on. 
         Rush L - Good for you.  You're Republican and I'm assuming that you
         





         voted                             (End)
         
         
         
         
         
         
         RUSLIMB2